Search 640toronto.com

Hosts & Shows
For The Good Of The Game?
Posted 8/9/2012 8:15:00 AM

FIFA has long resisted implementing replay technology into what is known as ‘The Beautiful Game’ of soccer. Instead, FIFA fully backs any refereeing decision made on the field and in that way, the refs have full support of the association. And it’s admirable the way FIFA stands behind its’ officials.

In the case of Norwegian ref Christiana Pedersen, FIFA has been prompted into damage control. This ref couldn’t keep it together during Monday’s match between the US and Canada. She allowed herself to be influenced by a player. That, for a ref, should be a cardinal sin and Ms. Pedersen’s dismissal should be considered.

FIFA has since stated that Ms. Pedersen will not be a part of either medal games today in London. That doesn’t sound like they’re standing behind their referee one hundred percent. Which is it FIFA? Either you have the referees’ backs or you don’t. The evidence in this case seems to indicate FIFA does not. It may be time to institute back up methods of determining the way a game is called.

Posted By: John Oakley  

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. WayneG_5 posted on 08/09/2012 01:09 PM
    John, the time violation was not the only bad call, the call for touching the ball with the players hand was also bad. My daughter said the player was protecting her body and I gather it should not have been called, some said it was incedental contact. It seems this ref was out of her leauge when calling such a high stress game. The players should not be allowed to try and influence reffs on calls. In this case the reff listened to the American player and it directly changed the game. I think it is time to bring in video replay, especially when stakes are so high.
  2. GC_2 posted on 08/10/2012 05:58 PM
    John as usual you don't know what you're talking about. There were only 2 game left to play, US-Jap., Can-Fra. Of the many referees available, FIFA picks the ones most deserving to ref the final games. FIFA still supported Pederson but gave the games to the more deserving refs. Maybe it's time you listen to a sports station and get your facts straight., but seeing how this is 640, opinion comes before facts.
  3. Joe Blow posted on 08/13/2012 11:30 AM
    Is it influence when a player reminds the ref about a technical rule? What the American did was brilliant, it showed she knows more about the rules than the ref or the Canadian goalie. The Hand Ball in the Penalty Area is debatable, I've seen it call both ways hundreds of times. I would have thought that the ref would have given the goalie a warning first, but it's her call. I agree with GC2, the ref was not sent home because she made a mistake in the Canada / US game, but because there were 2 games left and they had better refs available. I find it sour grapes that the Canadian women complained so much. If they wanted to win without the ref's influence, they should have scored more and let in less. In fact, Canada should have lost to the France in the Bronze medal game because France dominated them for the WHOLE game, but a lucky goal at the end game Canada the bronze. Take out all Olympic Sports with judging and refs that call fouls and all is good.
  4. MichaelC_17 posted on 08/13/2012 03:14 PM
    The best tem won in this U.S/Canada round...Get over it, it was only a silly boring game
showing all comments

<<May 2013>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678